In a surprising revelation that has sparked widespread discussions in Nigerian political circles, Vice President Kashim Shettima recently shared details of a tense episode from his time as Governor of Borno State. Speaking at a high-profile event in Abuja, Shettima recounted how former President Goodluck Jonathan reportedly considered removing him from office during the height of the Boko Haram crisis in the North-East region.
The disclosure came during the public launch of a memoir titled OPL 245: Inside Story of the $1.3 Billion Nigeria Oil Block, authored by former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mohammed Bello Adoke (SAN). The event, held at the Shehu Musa Yar’Adua Centre in the nation’s capital, attracted prominent figures from across the political spectrum, including former governors and senators.
Shettima, who led Borno State from 2011 to 2019, described the final years of Jonathan’s presidency as particularly challenging for him personally. He labeled himself as the “most vilified” figure in government circles at the time, even calling himself “public enemy number one.” Amid the escalating insecurity caused by Boko Haram insurgents, tensions reportedly ran high between the state leadership and the federal administration.
According to Shettima’s account, the idea of his removal was discussed in exclusive high-level meetings attended by top officials, including the President, Vice President, Senate President, and Speaker of the House of Representatives. In one such gathering, Jonathan allegedly raised the possibility of ousting the Borno governor. However, the plan was swiftly challenged by then-House Speaker Aminu Tambuwal, who boldly reminded the President of constitutional boundaries.
Tambuwal is said to have stated firmly: “Your Excellency, you lack the authority to remove an elected councillor, let alone a governor.” This intervention highlighted the safeguards embedded in Nigeria’s democratic framework, preventing executive overreach.
Undeterred, the matter was reportedly taken to a Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting. There, Adoke, in his capacity as the chief law officer, reiterated that the President had no constitutional power to unilaterally dismiss a sitting governor. Another Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) in the cabinet, Kabiru Turaki, supported Adoke’s position, effectively ending the discussion.
Shettima expressed profound gratitude to both Adoke and Tambuwal for their principled stance, noting that their actions not only preserved his tenure but also upheld the rule of law. He described the incident as the foundation of a lasting friendship with the two men, praising their bravery in defending democratic norms during a politically charged period.
The Vice President also mentioned that he and former President Jonathan have since reconciled, putting past differences behind them. This revelation adds a new layer to understanding the dynamics of governance during Jonathan’s administration (2010–2015), a time marked by significant security challenges in the North-East.
The Boko Haram insurgency, which intensified during those years, displaced millions and claimed countless lives, placing immense pressure on both state and federal authorities. Governors in affected states, including Shettima, often faced criticism for the handling of the crisis, while the federal government grappled with coordinating a national response.
This story underscores the importance of constitutional checks and balances in Nigeria’s presidential system. The 1999 Constitution clearly outlines the processes for removing elected officials, requiring involvement from the legislature and judiciary to prevent arbitrary actions. Attempts to bypass these provisions could undermine federalism and democratic stability.
Adoke’s memoir itself focuses on the controversial OPL 245 oil block deal, detailing his role and subsequent legal battles. The book launch provided a platform for reflections on public service, accountability, and forgiveness. Shettima commended Adoke for documenting his experiences, encouraging other former officials to do the same for historical accuracy.
In broader Nigerian politics, such disclosures remind citizens of the intricate power struggles that shape governance. The relationship between federal and state governments remains a recurring theme, especially in matters of security and resource control. Shettima’s experience highlights how personal and political rivalries can intersect with national crises.
Today, as Vice President under President Bola Tinubu, Shettima continues to play a key role in addressing lingering issues like insecurity in the North-East. Progress has been made in degrading Boko Haram’s capabilities, but challenges persist with splinter groups and banditry.
The event also featured calls for unity across party lines, with Shettima urging politicians to prioritize national development over partisan divides. Attendees included figures from different political backgrounds, symbolizing a rare moment of cross-aisle camaraderie.
Reactions to Shettima’s comments have been mixed. Some view it as a testament to resilience and the strength of institutions, while others see it as a glimpse into the pressures faced by leaders during turbulent times. Social media platforms buzzed with discussions, reviving debates on Jonathan’s legacy and the handling of the insurgency.
This anecdote reinforces the value of courage in public office. By standing firm on legal principles, individuals like Adoke and Tambuwal helped safeguard democracy during a critical juncture. As Nigeria continues to evolve politically, stories like these serve as valuable lessons for current and future leaders.
The memoir launch not only celebrated Adoke’s vindication in related legal matters but also sparked broader conversations on transparency, justice, and reconciliation in public life. In a nation with a complex political history, such openness contributes to healing and progress.
